If your mind creates and shapes your world and thus your creation, what happens when two or more independently, ingenuously woven worlds are meant to collide? You can experience this while reading, storytelling, in art exhibitions, graffiti walls and many more places. Two or more exclusive pieces seem to understand and subtly reply to each other. Different stories by different authors seem to be in continuation when it comes to the central idea. The message just above yours, in a graffiti wall, seems be related even if yours was completely genuine.
It is even more interesting when two people enter an indefinite, discreet conversation through multiple passive responses.
Now, it is indeed beautiful if the two people are unaware of the loop formed and still more beautiful if they unknowingly discover the loop, but the ambiguity doesn’t disappear. I call it ‘IDC’, Ingenuous Discontinuous Coherence.
The origin of this type of conversations is rooted in a chunk of randomness, centered on very few plausible topics, essentially passive.
A lot happens to the very innocent thoughts through their conversion into passive dialogues, a series of interrelated monologues. The ideas in their basic form are broken down to pieces, bits incepted by the preceding message and further manipulated by the existence of an empty stretch of time.
The obscure spontaneity, thus available at the initiation, is lost with time and is taken over by obvious choices of words, colors and existent ideas from the memory. The obvious choice, the result of which is just as much unexpected as conceivable, is then lent a creative hand.
The job of the sender, now, is not just to get the message through but also to sustain the passivity, to provide the receiver with just enough of the bits and the time for return. In case the sender fails in doing so, the end of the conversation is often marked by a revelation too sharp to keep up the compliance, the partial silence, provoking the receiver to withdraw on will.
The result, of course, is a complex, concealed exchange of beautifully scattered messages flowing in an almost perfect coherence.
It is even more interesting when two people enter an indefinite, discreet conversation through multiple passive responses.
Now, it is indeed beautiful if the two people are unaware of the loop formed and still more beautiful if they unknowingly discover the loop, but the ambiguity doesn’t disappear. I call it ‘IDC’, Ingenuous Discontinuous Coherence.
The origin of this type of conversations is rooted in a chunk of randomness, centered on very few plausible topics, essentially passive.
A lot happens to the very innocent thoughts through their conversion into passive dialogues, a series of interrelated monologues. The ideas in their basic form are broken down to pieces, bits incepted by the preceding message and further manipulated by the existence of an empty stretch of time.
The obscure spontaneity, thus available at the initiation, is lost with time and is taken over by obvious choices of words, colors and existent ideas from the memory. The obvious choice, the result of which is just as much unexpected as conceivable, is then lent a creative hand.
The job of the sender, now, is not just to get the message through but also to sustain the passivity, to provide the receiver with just enough of the bits and the time for return. In case the sender fails in doing so, the end of the conversation is often marked by a revelation too sharp to keep up the compliance, the partial silence, provoking the receiver to withdraw on will.
The result, of course, is a complex, concealed exchange of beautifully scattered messages flowing in an almost perfect coherence.
No comments:
Post a Comment